AN ‘extreme’ parking ban has been permitted alongside Wales’s largest natural lake – in an area where councillors believed a “tragedy” was waiting to happen.

In fine weather hundreds visitors park on the narrow B4403, on one side of Llyn Tegid between Bala and Llanuwchllyn.

The scenic route is popular with day-trippers taking in the stunning lake views and to watch passing steam trains from Rheilffordd Llyn Tegid/Bala Lake Railway.

But some “inconsiderate and reckless” motorists have created traffic congestion, particularly impacting locals in the Llangywer area and made it difficult for emergency vehicles to pass.

To resolve the issues Gwynedd Council’s planning committee agreed to a ‘clearway order’ along one side of the lake, on the B4403, between Llanuwchllyn and Bala, today Monday (June 24).

B4403 Between Llanuwchllyn And Bala (Cyngor Gwynedd planning documents image)

B4403 Between Llanuwchllyn And Bala (Cyngor Gwynedd planning documents image)

Clearways are stretches of road where it is forbidden to stop your car for any reason at any time – except for an emergency – and allow the council to take enforcement action including towing vehicles.

The order will only apply to the carriageway, and lay-bys along the route will still be available for parking.

Officer Iwan ap Trefor said that “during periods of fine weather in the summer, it has become clear that Llyn Tegid is an attraction for many visitors.

“Recently, this has led to parking problems along the narrow road in the Llangywer area on the B4403.

“The Traffic unit has received complaints from Officers of the National Park and members of Llangywer Parish Council, all expressing their concerns about the detrimental effects of inconsiderate parking.

“The reckless parking has not only caused traffic congestion, much to the annoyance of local residents, but has also hampered the response time of emergency services.

“In response to these issues, we propose to implement a clearway restriction on the road, which we believe will alleviate the current parking problems and improve emergency response.”

But one objector to the plan, had claimed the clearway order was an “extreme” response to a specific issue that only impacted certain sections of the road, occasionally.

But Mr ap Trefor said officers felt the response was not extreme.

“The road is very narrow, we believe introducing a restriction in just one place would lead to parking issues in other areas along the road.”

It was also not considered that there would be an increase or reduction of pedestrians using the road, nor to impact parking in the Llanwuchllyn area, which was considered far enough away from the lakeside problem area and lay-bys would would still be available for parking.

Llanuwchllyn Cllr Alan Jones Evans agreed that the area had seen a “great increase” in visitors since Covid.

“When the weather is fine, inconsiderate parking causes congestion for many hours from Easter to September, all the world and his wife, come to the area,” he said.

This had hampered emergency vehicles accessing the lake and community.

“Hundreds of people go into the lake, this could be a real accident waiting to happen.” he said.

“I feel as the local member we have to respond, to make sure that emergency vehicles can get through.

“It could be a tragedy waiting to happen.”

Cllr John Pughe, a regular user of the road agreed saying at times it was often “quite difficult” to pass, including for larger emergency vehicles.

“The lake does does bring many people to the are, perhaps if there was a farmer wo would be willing to open a field for parking, it could resolve the problems?” he suggested.

Cllr Anne Lloyd-Jones agreed saying it could be “an opportunity for a farmer to make some money.”

But Mr ap Trefor pointed out, the matter before the committee was “in relation to creating a clearway.

“Opportunities for parking were not for under consideration today, although any landowner who might be interested would have to pursue the matter with the national park planning officers.” He added.

Several councillors added their support to approve the officers’ recommendation to accept the clearway order.

In a vote it was permitted, with 12 votes in favour, one abstention, no one against.